Hereās a bold statement: Cooking dinner at home could be the key to saving money, improving health, and even indulging in your passionsāall at the same time. But hereās where it gets controversial: What if I told you that paying yourself to cook could be the secret sauce to breaking the cycle of ordering takeout? Let me explain.
My 2026 resolution is simple yet ambitious: Reduce the number of dinners ordered to my house. Itās no small feat, given how easy it is to fall into the habit of clicking āorder now.ā But Iāve devised a strategy thatās both motivating and rewarding. I call it āpaying myself to cook.ā
This isnāt my first rodeo with this approach. Last year, I used a similar method to cut back on alcohol, rewarding myself with $2 for every day I abstained. By the end of the year, Iād saved several hundred dollars in a virtual account I affectionately named āDiscretionary Plus.ā The best part? I could spend that money guilt-free on something funāa win-win.
Now, Iām applying the same logic to cooking. For every dinner I prepare at home (or, letās be honest, every dinner my family and I donāt order in), I transfer $5 into my Discretionary Plus account. Whether itās a gourmet meal from a Julia Child cookbook or a frozen pizza on a Friday night, it all counts. Even leftovers earn me another $5. And yes, if my partner or daughter cooks, I still get the rewardāitās my resolution, after all. (But letās keep that between us.)
Hereās the math: If this approach eliminates just one ordered meal per week, we could save $50 weekly, or $2,600 annually, after accounting for groceries. Thatās a significant chunk of change. But the real kicker? By the end of the year, Iāll have $1,300 in my Discretionary Plus account to spend on something I truly love.
And this is the part most people miss: The money saved is only half the motivation. The other half is the spending part. Knowing Iām saving for something meaningfulālike vinyl records, a nostalgic passion Iāve recently rekindledāmakes tying on an apron feel less like a chore and more like an investment in my happiness. Sure, new vinyl records arenāt cheap, but with my Discretionary Plus account, the guilt melts away.
Now, letās address the elephant in the room: Is this approach too good to be true? Could it work for anyone? I think so, but the key is finding the right balance. The dollar amount needs to be motivating without feeling punitive. For me, $5 strikes that balance, but for someone else, it might be $2 or $10. The trick is tailoring it to your lifestyle.
You could apply this method to other areas tooācutting back on smoking, doomscrolling, or even encouraging positive habits like walking more or learning a new language. On the spending side, the possibilities are endless: Save for a vacation, pay off debt, or donate to charity. The important thing is giving your savings a purpose.
Iām only five days into this resolution, but the results are already encouraging. Four home-cooked meals in a row, $25 in my account, and a fridge full of leftover chili. Iām genuinely excited to hit the grocery storeāsomething I never thought Iād say.
But hereās the controversial question: Is this approach sustainable, or is it just a short-term fix? Could it backfire if the reward becomes the primary focus, rather than the habit itself? Iād love to hear your thoughts. Do you think this method could work for you? Or is it too gimmicky? Letās start a conversationāagree or disagree, I want to hear from you.
And if youāre feeling inspired, share your 2026 savings goal with me at dberman@globeandmail.com. Who knows? Your idea might just be the next big thing in personal finance.